MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985774050 · doi:10.1007/s11746-001-0276-1

Multivariate model for the prediction of soluble condensed tannins in crude extracts of polyphenols from canola and rapeseed hulls

2001· article· en· W1985774050 on OpenAlexaff
M. Naczk, J. Pink, Ryszard Amarowicz, David A. Pink, Fereidoon Shahidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCanolaPolyphenolRapeseedPartial least squares regressionProanthocyanidinChemistryVanillinMultivariate statisticsChromatographyTanninMathematicsFood scienceStatisticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The feasibility of using ultraviolet spectrophotometry to develop multivariate models for prediction of soluble condensed tannins (SCT) content in crude polyphenols extracts from canola and rapeseed hulls was investigated. The polyphenols were extracted from hulls using 70% (vol/vol) aqueous acetone. Partial least squares regression was used to correlate the spectral data of the crude polyphenols in methanol between 265–295 nm with the SCT content in hulls. Both the proanthocyanidin (P) and the vanillin (V) assays were used to provide reference data for creating the models. The predictive ability of the models is good, as indicated by the RPD values [the ratio of the standard deviation of data to the standard error of calibration (SEC) of above 5. Additionally, the SEC values suggest that P is superior to V in predicting the SCT content of hulls using this method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207