MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985774656 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22142

Dynamic behaviours and control of full tower heat integrated air separation columns

2014· article· en· W1985774656 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liang Chang, Xinggao Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Multivariable calculusPID controllerDecoupling (probability)Nonlinear systemAutoregressive modelFractionating columnComputer scienceTemperature controlControl (management)Control engineeringDistillationEngineeringMathematicsChemistryPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heat integrated air separation column (HIASC) is a frontier in the energy‐saving distillation research. The dynamic model of HIASC is first proposed. The dynamic behaviours such as strong asymmetric nonlinearity and distinct inverse responses are first investigated based on the simulation results of the dynamic model to give some insight into the dynamic difficulties associated with the control of a high purity HIASC. The multi‐loop PID (M‐PID) and the autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model based generic model control (GMC) scheme are then explored. Furthermore, a multivariable decoupling ARX model is proposed in order to eliminate the interaction between the two single control loops. At last, an adaptive generic model control (ADGMC) scheme for HIASC is presented. The detailed comparative research works are carried out, and the results show that the ADGMC overcomes the interaction of the control loops and the model mismatch of GMC, and hence improves the control performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207