Numerical Simulation of Airflow Characteristics in Air Suction Gun
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated numerically flow patterns in the air suction gun and dependence of the flow pattern on the supplied air pressure in order to clarify the working mechanism of an air suction gun. The compressed air issued from compressed-air inflow tubes into a yarn passage accelerates with sucked ambient air owing to negative pressure generated by the compressed air, and attains a critical speed near the throat of the de Laval tube and a supersonic speed in the divergent part of the de Laval tube. The supersonic flow generates a normal shock wave and changes into a subsonic flow. Then, the air is discharged into the atmosphere. Since this compressed air has a circumferential component, it forms a helical flow along the wall of the yarn propulsion tube composed of the de Laval tube and the straight tube. Velocity and density of the helical airflow near the wall are larger than those near the centerline. The suction efficiency is promoted greatly owing to this high focusing ability (bias of high speed and density flow toward the vicinity of the wall) and a large yarn length in the helical airflow. Increased supplied air pressure brings about increases in both air density and supersonic flow region, which promotes the yarn suction force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it