MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985798327 · doi:10.1134/s1063785015010174

A phase-sensitive coherence reflectometer with amplitude-phase modulation of probing pulses

2015· article· en· W1985798327 on OpenAlex
А. Э. Алексеев, V S Vdovenko, B. G. Gorshkov, В. Т. Потапов, D. E. Simikin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical Physics Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsPhase modulationAmplitudePhase (matter)Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Modulation (music)Amplitude modulationSIGNAL (programming language)Optical time-domain reflectometerOptical fiberMaterials sciencePhysicsFiber optic sensorFrequency modulationPolarization-maintaining optical fiberPhase noiseAcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsRadio frequency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results of investigation of a phase-sensitive fiber-optic coherence reflectometer with amplitude-phase modulation of probing pulses are presented. Using this method of modulation, it is possible to reconstruct the signal of external impact upon the reflectometer fiber by means of the phase diversity technique. The applicability of the proposed method is theoretically justified and experimentally verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it