A Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as an Ovarian Tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that arise anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract. In this paper, we present the case of a GIST presenting as an adnexal mass. A 52-year-old woman presented to our gynecologic outpatient department with a pelvic mass that was found during a routine pelvic ultrasound scan. At the subsequent surgery, the mass was found to have arisen from the small bowel rather than from the adnexa, and a small bowel resection was then performed. A histologic investigation confirmed that the mass was a GIST. This case demonstrates the importance of considering a diagnosis other than gynecologic causes for pelvic masses that do not have a classical presentation either clinically or radiologically, as well as the importance of maintaining a close working relationship with the general surgeons when unexpected pathologies are encountered, in order to administer the correct surgical management of the patient's underlying pathology. (J GYNECOL SURG 23:57)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".