Des rédemptions à crédit : Le sujet-théâtre et les retournements orphiques de Claude Gauvreau1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir du cas de Claude Gauvreau, il est question dans cet article d’un théâtre identitaire par lequel cet auteur élabore sa propre figure en associant et en croisant des représentations d’individus marquants de sa vie. Êtres inaccessibles ou décédés, ces « fantômes » agissent à titre de personnages dans une dynamique subjective qui coïncide avec les lignes de force des Oeuvres créatrices complètes , projet rétrospectif dont l’auteur a lui-même élaboré le plan. Qu’elle ravive l’amante suicidée, le peintre Paul-Émile Borduas ou le père absent, l’écriture de Gauvreau se veut une lyrique de l’impossible, où les répétitions sémantiques et sonores articulent le paradoxe d’un chant orphique qui regagne en perpétuant la perte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".