Des rédemptions à crédit : Le sujet-théâtre et les retournements orphiques de Claude Gauvreau1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir du cas de Claude Gauvreau, il est question dans cet article d’un théâtre identitaire par lequel cet auteur élabore sa propre figure en associant et en croisant des représentations d’individus marquants de sa vie. Êtres inaccessibles ou décédés, ces « fantômes » agissent à titre de personnages dans une dynamique subjective qui coïncide avec les lignes de force des Oeuvres créatrices complètes, projet rétrospectif dont l’auteur a lui-même élaboré le plan. Qu’elle ravive l’amante suicidée, le peintre Paul-Émile Borduas ou le père absent, l’écriture de Gauvreau se veut une lyrique de l’impossible, où les répétitions sémantiques et sonores articulent le paradoxe d’un chant orphique qui regagne en perpétuant la perte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".