MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985836192 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab182

182 EFFECT OF OVULATION-INDUCING FACTOR ON DEVELOPMENT AND VASCULAR PERFUSION OF THE OVULATORY FOLLICLE AND CORPUS LUTEUM IN LLAMAS

2012· article· en· W1985836192 on OpenAlexaffabout
César Ulloa-Leal, O. A. Bogle, Gregory P. Adams, Marcelo Ratto

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvulationFollicleCorpus luteumFollicular phaseEstrous cycleMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyOvarian follicleUltrasonographyPerfusionAndrologyOvaryHormoneSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the study was to determine if purified ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) from llama seminal plasma evokes changes in tissue vascular area of the preovulatory follicle and CL. Mature non-lactating, non-pregnant, female llamas (n = 20) were monitored by transrectal ultrasonography using a 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer (MyLab 5, Canadian Veterinary Imaging) to determine ovarian follicular status. Llamas with a growing follicle (for 3 consecutive days) =8 mm were assigned randomly to 2 groups (n = 10/group) and given an i.m. dose of (1) 50 µg of gonadorelin acetate or (2) 1 mg of purified OIF from llama seminal plasma. Llamas were examined daily by transrectal ultrasonography using B-mode and power Doppler mode from Day 0 (day of treatment) to Day 16 to detect ovulation and CL development, and to calculate the area of blood-flow signal in the preovulatory follicle at 12 h after treatment and in the CL on Days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16. Power Doppler images were recorded, edited, and analysed using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Data were compared between groups by Student t-test, chi-square, and ANOVA for repeated measures. No differences were detected between GnRH and OIF groups, respectively, in the diameter of the preovulatory follicle at the time of treatment (9.7 ± 0.3 v. 9.9 ± 0.4 mm), ovulation rate (10/10 v. 10/10), interval from treatment to ovulation (32.0 ± 0.6 v. 30.4 ± 1.8 h), maximum CL diameter (13.05 ± 0.4 v. 13.5 ± 0.3 mm), or the day on which the CL reached the maximum diameter (8.7 ± 0.3 v. 8.2 ± 0.2). The preovulatory follicle from llamas treated with purified OIF had a greater (P = 0.0001) blood-flow signal area after treatment than that of the GnRH group. Similarly, the luteal tissue of llamas treated with purified OIF had a greater (P = 0.001) blood-flow signal area than that of the GnRH group on Days 4, 6, 12, and 16 after treatment. We conclude that OIF purified from llama seminal plasma increases the vascular perfusion of the preovulatory follicle and the subsequent CL, consistent with the hypothesis that OIF is luteotrophic. Research funded by Chilean National Science and Technology Research Council (Fondecyt Regular 1120518), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Alpaca Research Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207