A General Dynamic Linear Tensor-Diffusivity Subgrid-Scale Heat Flux Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Thermal Flows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a general dynamic linear tensor diffusivity model is proposed for representing the subgrid-scale (SGS) heat flux (HF). The tensor diffusivity for the model is an inhomogeneous linear function of the resolved strain and rotation rate tensors, and includes three conventional dynamic SGS HF modeling approaches as special cases. In contrast to the dynamic SGS eddy diffusivity modeling approach, the proposed model admits more degrees of freedom for representing the SGS thermal diffusivity, allows for nonalignment between the SGS HF and resolved temperature gradient, and consequently provides a more realistic geometric representation of the SGS heat flux. To validate the proposed modeling approach, numerical simulations have been performed based on a combined forced- and natural-convention flow in a vertical channel with a Reynolds number and a Grashof number Gr = 9.6 × 105. In comparison with the reported direct numerical simulation data and the results obtained using the conventional dynamic SGS eddy diffusivity model, it is shown that the proposed model is able to provide good predictions of various flow quantities at the resolved scale and, more important, offer new insights into near-wall flow physics at the subgrid scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it