On run time libraries and hierarchical symbiosis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Run time libraries (RTL) in genetic programming (GP) represent a scenario in which individuals evolved under an earlier independent evolutionary run can be potentially incorporated into a following GP run. To date, schemes for exploiting the RTL metaphor have emphasized syntactic over behavioural approaches. Thus, instructions are added to the later run such that the previous code can be explicitly indexed. In this work we demonstrate how the RTL concept is naturally supported by adopting a symbiotic framework for coevolution. Under the Pinball reinforcement learning task, we demonstrate how the initial RTL can be coevolved within a simpler formulation of the task and then used as the basis for providing solutions to a more difficult target task under the same domain. The resulting solutions are stronger than an RTL as coevolved against the target task alone or symbiosis as evolved without support for RTL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it