LLDPE‐based mono‐ and multilayer blown films: Effect of processing parameters on properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study we investigated the effect of processing parameters on the end‐use properties of mono‐ and five‐layer coextruded polyethylene (PE) blown films using three different linear low‐density PE (LLDPE) resins. The three investigated LLDPEs were a conventional Ziegler‐Natta gas phase ethylene‐butene copolymer, and two solution ethylene‐octene resins produced with Ziegler‐Natta and single‐site catalysts. The octene copolymers were produced using NOVA Chemicals Advanced SCLAIRTECH™ process and catalyst technologies. It was found that within the investigated range of processing conditions, tear strength increased in the direction perpendicular to the highest orientation, impact and puncture strength increased with the overall orientation, and the effect of orientation due to shear stresses in the die was negligible because of rapid macromolecular relaxation before crystallization. Finally, it was also shown that due to changes in the size of the crystallites, haze increased with die gap and frost line height (FLH), and decreased as take‐up speed (TUS) increased. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 45:1214–1221, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".