MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1985953807 · doi:10.1353/his.0.0076

Developing Alberta's Oil Sands: From Karl Clark to Kyoto (review)

2009· article· en· W1985953807 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Erik Lizée

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil sandsExpansivePoliticsOil reservesPetroleum industryPetroleumPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistoryEngineeringArchaeologyLawGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Developing Alberta's Oil Sands: From Karl Clark to Kyoto Erik Lizée Chastko, Paul —Developing Alberta's Oil Sands: From Karl Clark to Kyoto. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2004; 2007. Pp. 320. As the importance of the Athabasca oil sands grows steadily in contemporary economic and political spheres, a growing number of focused, academic studies have emerged that examine this important resource. Developing Alberta's Oil [End Page 231] Sands represents one of the more ambitious of these projects; it "attempt[s] to present the reader with a single-volume history" of the entirety of oil sands developments (p. xiv). Expanded and refined from the author's PhD dissertation written while at the University of Ohio, the study provides a comprehensive political and economic discussion of oil sands development from rudimentary endeavours in the early twentieth century to the current slate of mega-projects. Paul Chastko examines the interplay between various states (Canadian, Albertan, and American), the oil industry, the scientific community, and the international petroleum market. What emerges is a valuable and easily accessible narrative of the sands' development. The first section, comprising three chapters and dealing with the period 1920– 1945, discusses in detail the political and economic forces surrounding early attempts at development. Of particular importance are Dr. Karl Clark and Sidney Blair, the early mishaps of the various pilot plants, and the often-tumultuous federal-provincial relationship —all set against the backdrop of the provincial quest for control over natural resources. The second section, an expansive six chapters dealing with the post-1945 period, emphasizes the provincial government's desire to see the sands commercialized, the nature of corporate investment in the oil sands, their role in the larger North American energy market, and their relationship with the emerging environmentalist movement. Particularly informative are the sections that discuss the sands in relation to the OPEC-driven price shocks and the massive commercialization of the sands that occurred under Premier Ralph Klein. Chastko's work is noteworthy for its significant inclusion of the American influence in the saga of oil sands development —his study represents one of the first properly historicized works to incorporate American (and international) sources into the discussion. The reader occasionally wonders, however, whether this came at the expense of Canadian sources. Peter Lougheed's papers, as well as those of some federal government departments, are noticeably absent, while an over-reliance on Hansard is apparent. One of the main themes throughout the book pertains to the tepidity with which corporate entities approached investment in the sands. Chastko engages in lengthy discussions surrounding the "required conditions" for direct investment and the many handicaps that held back substantial investment. This focus on corporate attitudes towards the oil sands leads to certain problems, most noticeably in the last chapter examining environmental issues. Chastko demonstrates a visible sympathy towards the oil companies, especially in relation to the federal government. Aworrisome tendency to frame environmental concerns as minor and misguided becomes apparent. As just one example, we can look at the sources examined. Chastko quotes a National Post article that laments "the remarkable ignorance about the importance of hydrocarbon energy to Canada's economy" on the part of citizens evaluating the Kyoto Accord (p. 236), a Fraser Institute report, and an editorial by Gwyn Morgan (then CEO of Encana). A single document from David Suzuki is presented in response, while other organizations protesting oil sands development (like the Pembina Institute, Greenpeace, and the Sierra [End Page 232] Club) are ignored completely. Also absent from the final chapter is a serious discussion of the general desirability of exploiting the sands, the potential and massive consequences of development for the Athabasca River watershed (the third largest in North America), or the possibility of a Florida-sized strip mine in northern Alberta. Another problem with the work deserves mention. The early sections, which discuss dominion-provincial relations, embryonic separation processes, and the Clark-Ells clash, do not contribute much to an understanding of early development of the oil sands above and beyond the discussion presented in Barry Ferguson's Athabasca Oil Sands: Northern Resource Exploration, 1875–1951 (Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center, 1975). Similarly, the chapter analysing...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207