Continuous positive airway pressure improves nocturnal baroreflex sensitivity of patients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the acute effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) for heart rate during sleep in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DESIGN AND METHODS: In eight CHF patients with OSA not previously treated with CPAP, spontaneous BRS was assessed during overnight polysomnography prior to the onset of sleep, and during stage 2 non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) before, during and after application of CPAP. RESULTS: CPAP alleviated OSA and acutely increased the slope of BRS (median, 25%,75%) [from 3.9 (3.5, 4.8) to 6.2 (4.6, 26.2) ms/mmHg, P<0.05]. Increases in the slope of BRS persisted following withdrawal of CPAP [4.9 (4.3, 6.9) ms/mmHg, P<0.05]. CPAP also lowered heart rate (from 81.3 +/- 4.9 to 76.0 +/- 5.7 bpm, P< 0.05), an effect which persisted after its withdrawal (76.7 +/- 5.7 bpm, P < 0.05). Systolic blood pressure at the midpoint of the pressure range of BRS sequences fell while on CPAP (from 139 +/- 8 to 120 +/- 7 mmHg, P < 0.05), and remained lower following CPAP withdrawal (124 +/- 9 mmHg, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In CHF patients with OSA, CPAP increases acutely BRS during sleep, lowers heart rate and resets the operating point for BRS to a lower blood pressure. These effects of CPAP persist after its withdrawal, suggesting that nocturnal CPAP therapy may cause sustained improvement in the neural control of heart rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".