Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L'oeuvre critique (1933-1938) de l'abbé Albert Dandurand est peu connu. Première synthèse approfondie de l'histoire des genres littéraires au Québec (après Edmond Lareau et avant Séraphin Marion), elle est aussi la première histoire littéraire positiviste du Québec. Dandurand se donne comme tâche de parler de la littérature en elle-même, s'écartant ainsi du discours historique critique dominant de Camille Roy. Cet article veut montrer sur quoi repose l'originalité de l'approche critique de Dandurand quand il analyse les oeuvres romantiques québécoises du XIX' siècle: la visée esthétique de son discours plutôt que la visée politique; des catégories analytiques (notions d Influence et de couleur.) qui servent l'explication plutôt que les jugements de valeur; bref, une distance critique qui permet à l'historien de parler de la littérature du XIX' siècle en elle-même.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".