Time-Varying Meshing Stiffness Calculation and Vibration Analysis for a 16DOF Dynamic Model With Linear Crack Growth in a Pinion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modified mathematical model for simulating gear crack from root with linear growth path in a pinion is developed, in which an improved potential energy method is used to calculate the time-varying meshing stiffnesses of the meshing gear pair while we also take the deformation of gear-body into consideration. The formulas for the meshing stiffness are deduced when the crack grows as the linear growth path in the pinion. A 16DOF dynamic model of a one-stage spur gear system is used to study the response from the system considering time-varying meshing stiffnesses and different levels of crack growing in the pinion. As vibration signals induced by the tooth crack are buried in normal vibration signals which are induced by the normal gear pair in meshing at the early stage of crack growth, the algorithm combined autoregressive modeling method and demodulation method is proposed to process the signals to investigate the response characteristics as the crack grows, and the comparison of the relationship between indicators and the crack levels from different simulation methods are given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it