Combined analysis of 635 patients confirms an age-related association of the serotonin 2A receptor gene with tardive dyskinesia and specificity for the non-orofacial subtype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is an important limiting factor in the use of typical antipsychotic drugs. Genetic variability in the serotonin 2A (5-HT(2A)) receptor may influence risk for TD but the results of prior studies are not confirmatory. The objective of this study was to determine association of T102C and His452Tyr polymorphisms in the 5-HT(2A) receptor gene (HTR(2A)) with TD in a large, multicentre patient sample. The design employed case-control analysis controlling for possible confounders using pooled, original data from published and available unpublished samples and employing logistic regression, analysis of variance and meta-analysis. The study sample consisted of 635 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (256 with TD and 379 without TD) drawn from five research centres, divided into six groups based on population origin. The main outcome measure was association of a categorical diagnosis of TD based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TD with HTR(2A) T102C and His452Tyr genotypes and haplotypes. The findings indicate significant association of TD with HTR(2A) T102C genotype (p=0.002) over and above the effect of population group, also when controlling for age and gender (p=0.0008), but not with His452Tyr genotype. The T102C genotype was significantly associated with TD in older (>median age 47 yr, p=0.002) but not younger patients and in patients with non-orofacial (limb-truncal) (p=0.001) but not orofacial TD. By meta-analysis the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) pooled odds ratio (OR) across all the available data was 1.64. A T102C-His452Tyr haplotype was significantly associated with TD (p=0.0008). These findings confirm that genetic variability in HTR(2A) contributes a small but significant degree of risk for the expression of TD, particularly in older patients and specifically for the non-orofacial (limb-truncal) type. Together with other genetic variants associated with TD the findings could be used to assess risk in patients who are candidates for treatment with typical antipsychotic medications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".