MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of Dietary Patterns With Cancer Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

2008· article· en· W1986040001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioColorectal cancerInternal medicineConfidence intervalCancerDiseaseProportional hazards modelStage (stratigraphy)Prospective cohort studyGastroenterologyAdjuvant chemotherapyRandomized controlled trialSurgeryBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While dietary factors have been implicated in the risk of developing colon cancer, it is not clear whether diet influences the outcome in patients who have established disease. This question was addressed in a prospective observational study of 1009 patients with stage III colon cancer who enrolled in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in 1999–2001. Participants were asked to complete a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire midway in the course of chemotherapy and again about 6 months after adjuvant therapy ceased. Two major dietary patterns emerged: a prudent pattern with high intakes of fruits and vegetables, poultry, and fish; and a Western pattern with high intakes of meat, fat, refined grains, and deserts. The median follow-up interval was 5.3 years. Recurrent disease developed during follow-up in 324 patients, and 223 of them died with recurrent disease. Another 28 patients died without documented recurrent disease. Higher intake of a Western dietary pattern following diagnosis of colon cancer was associated with significantly worse disease-free survival. Compared with patients in the lowest quintile of the Western pattern, those in the highest quintile had an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for disease-free survival of 3.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04–5.19). The AHR for recurrence-free survival was 2.85 (95% CI, 1.75–4.63). For overall survival, the AHR associated with intake of a Western dietary pattern was 2.32, with a 95% CI of 1.36–3.96. The reduced disease-free survival associated with a Western diet was not significantly altered when adjusted for gender, age, lymph node stage, body mass index, level of physical activity, performance status at baseline, or treatment group. The prudent dietary pattern, in contrast, was not significantly associated with recurrent cancer or cancer mortality. The AHR for disease-free survival, comparing the highest and lowest quintiles of the prudent dietary pattern, was 1.20 (95% CI, 0.83–1.75). There also was no relationship between the prudent pattern and either recurrence-free survival or overall survival. The investigators believe this to be the first study in a potentially cured group of colon cancer survivors to analyze the effects of diet. Further studies hopefully will identify those elements of a Western dietary pattern that are most closely associated with an adverse outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it