MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986043678 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2012.2205579

A Multiscale Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model for Object-Oriented Clustering of VHR Panchromatic Satellite Images

2012· article· en· W1986043678 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisProbabilistic logicLatent Dirichlet allocationArtificial intelligenceTopic modelStatistical modelPattern recognition (psychology)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel model is presented to address the problem of semantic clustering of geo-objects in very high resolution panchromatic satellite images. The proposed model combines a probabilistic topic model with a multiscale image representation into an automatic framework by embedding both document and scale selections. The probabilistic topic model is used to characterize the statistical distributions of both intraclass appearance and inter-class coherence of geo-objects within documents, i.e., squared sub-images. Because the bag-of-words assumption involved in the probabilistic topic models does not consider the spatial coherence between topic labels, the multiscale image representation is designed to provide a self-adaptive spatial regularization for various geo-object categories. By introducing scale and document selections, the automatic framework integrates the probabilistic topic model and the multiscale image representation to ensure that words on a site should be allocated the same topic label no matter what documents they reside in. Consequently, unlike the traditional method of applying topic models for analyzing satellite images, the process of explicitly generating a set of documents before modeling and then combining multiple labels for a word on a given site is unnecessary. Gibbs sampling is adopted for parameter estimation and image clustering. Extensive experimental evaluations are designed to first analyze the effect of parameters in the proposed model and then compare the results of our model with those of some state-of-the-art methods for three different types of images. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm consistently outperforms these exiting state-of-the-art methods in all of the experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it