A new phylogeny and phylogenetic classification for the Canthyloscelidae (Diptera: Psychodomorpha)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new phylogeny and phylogenetic classification for the Canthyloscelidae (Diptera: Psychodomorpha) is presented. A phylogenetic analysis of the Scatopsoidea is performed. A sister-group relationship between the Canthyloscelidae and Scatopsidae is accepted and the monophyly of the Canthyloscelidae is corroborated, including the genera Exiliscelis, Synneuron, Hyperoscelis, and Canthyloscelis. An earlier phylogenetic analysis of the group is considered, in which Synneuron was accepted as the sister-group of the Scatopsidae and Exiliscelis was considered the sister-group of Synneuron + Scatopsidae. Some apomorphic similarities between the larvae of all genera of Canthyloscelidae, especially the reduction of the head capsule, are considered true synapomorphies. Exiliscelis is considered the sister-group of the rest of the family and is placed in a new subfamily, Exiliscelinae. In the Canthyloscelinae, Synneuron is the sister-group of Hyperoscelis + Canthyloscelis. A phylogenetic classification of the group is proposed. Prohyperoscelis rohdendorfi Kovalev, 1985, from the Middle Jurassic in Russia, is accepted as the sister-group of Canthyloscelis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".