MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986065972 · doi:10.1115/imece2012-85944

Random Gear Dynamics Based on Path Integration Method

2012· article· en· W1986065972 on OpenAlexaff
Jianming Yang, Ping Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbability density functionRandom vibrationMathematicsNonlinear systemNumerical integrationProbability distributionDiscretizationApplied mathematicsStochastic processMathematical analysisControl theory (sociology)VibrationComputer sciencePhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gears exhibit vibrations during operation which contain apparently random components. Due to time-varying stiffness and backlash nonlinearity, it is very hard, if not impossible, to get a closed form response of gears under combination of deterministic and random loads. This paper employs a numerical method termed as path integration to obtain the probability density of the response at discrete time instants. The random excitation is assumed to be White noise. The response of the gear is a Markovian processes under the random excitation. In order to capture the probability density evolution, discretization is applied to both space and time. The transition probability between adjacent time instants is assumed to be Gaussian and the calculation of the probability density is made on a reduced finite space. The mean and variance, which are used to construct the Gaussian distribution, are obtained through a direct numerical integration scheme with one stochastic Newmark method. Statistic linearization technique is utilized within each individual time-step to find a linear equivalent of the original system with backlash nonlinearity. Through this method the evolution of the probability distribution function of the response displacement and the velocity is calculated. Three representative cases with different levels of constant load are investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207