Detecting Structural Polydispersity in Branched Polybutadienes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural details of a set of highly entangled H-shaped polybutadienes (PBDs) prepared by anionic polymerization were examined in detail by three reputable laboratories using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and temperature gradient interaction chromatography (TGIC). While SEC data indicated that samples having the desired structures (i.e., nearly monodisperse H-shaped polymer) had been produced, additional SEC data from other laboratories showed that the samples were structurally more complex than originally thought. TGIC data revealed that while the samples did not contain high molecular weight byproducts, they did contain low molecular weight byproducts. To discern these structural details of the branched PBDs, small amounts of sample were fractionated by TGIC. By combining knowledge of the polymerization process with the TGIC data of fractionated samples, it was possible to work out the detailed compositions of the samples and the branching structures of each component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it