MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986081538 · doi:10.1109/noms.2006.1687553

Hierarchical Creation of Virtual Networks

2006· article· en· W1986081538 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed El-Darieby, Jerome Rolia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingComputer networkVirtual networkNetwork management stationScalabilityOverlay networkHierarchical routingTemporal isolation among virtual machinesHierarchical network modelRouting protocolNetwork simulationNetwork management applicationNetwork architectureNetwork topologyRouting (electronic design automation)The InternetCloud computingVirtualizationLink-state routing protocolWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a scalable and hierarchical virtual network creation (HVNC) protocol. The protocol encapsulates network control operations such as signaling and routing. It relies on a hierarchical organization of network resources and their managers. The network hierarchy of HVNC provides network-wide views of network resource status. This enables network-wide decisions such as balancing traffic loads among network domains and traffic isolation in accordance to policies. HVNC enables flexible and dynamic virtual network management including reconfiguration and failure recovery. These advantages come at the cost of higher setup and information storage costs when compared to standard service creation protocols. We characterize the advantages and costs of HVNC by simulation. The relatively high costs of HVNC make it more suitable to create long-lived high-bandwidth virtual networks. This type of virtual networks supports emerging technologies and applications such as grid and peer-to-peer computing and data-intensive e-science applications

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207