MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1986116546 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811391e

Chemical stratification in the Orion Bar: JCMT spectral legacy survey observations<i>(Corrigendum)</i>

2010· erratum· en· W1986116546 on OpenAlexaff
M. H. D. van der Wiel, F. van der Tak, V. Ossenkopf, M. Spaans, H. Roberts, G. A. Fuller, R. Plume

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2010
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsBar (unit)Error barSpectral lineTable (database)Analytical Chemistry (journal)AstronomyChemistryMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integrated line intensities in Table 1 of Van der Wiel et al. (2009, A&A 498, 161) should be modified due to an error in the adopted channel widths: values are reduced by ~20% for C2H, H2CO and SO, reduced by a factor ~5 for C18O and HCN, and increased by ~40% for 13CO. Derived column densities for C2H, H2CO and SO are decreased by ~20%; for C18O it is increased by ~40%. Corrected abundance values of C2H, H2CO and SO are a factor <2 smaller than the originally published values. The values for HCN column densities and abundance are replaced by lower limits. Consequences for the discussion and conclusions are minor. In addition, the southwest arrow in Fig. 1 should be shifted to the southwest by ~10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→