Efficient design of sparse FIR filters with optimized filter length
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large number of experiments have demonstrated that for an FIR filter the sparsity of filter coefficients is highly related to its filter order. However, traditional sparse FIR filter design methods focus on how to increase the number of zero-valued coefficients, but overlook the impact of filter orders on design performance. As an attempt to jointly optimize filter length and sparsity of an FIR filter, a novel method is proposed in this paper to design sparse linear-phase FIR filters. With peak error constraints, the objective function of the design problem is formulated as a combination of the sparsity of filter coefficients and a measure of the effective filter order. Then, the design problem is then recast as a weighted l <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</inf> -norm optimization problem, which is solved by an efficient numerical method based on the iterative-reweighted-least-squares (IRLS) algorithms. Experimental results illustrate that the proposed method can efficiently reduce the effective filter order while enhancing the sparsity of an FIR filter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it