MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986199813 · doi:10.1142/s021773230802968x

SOLVING THE KAONIC-HELIUM PUZZLE

2008· article· en· W1986199813 on OpenAlexaff
R. Hayano, G. Beer, H. Bhang, M. Cargnelli, J. Chiba, S. Choi, C. Curceanu, Y. Fukuda, T. Hanaki, Takashi Ishikawa, S. Ishimoto, T. Ishiwatari, K. Itahashi, M. Iwai, M. Iwasaki, B. Juhász, P. Kienle, J. Márton, Y. Matsuda, H. Ohnìshì, S. Okada, H. Outa, M. Sato, Philipp C. Schmid, S. Suzuki, Takehiro Suzuki, H. Tatsuno, D. Tomono, E. Widmann, T. Yamazaki, H. Yim, J. Zmeskal

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsHeliumBalmer seriesNuclear physicsEnergy (signal processing)DetectorQuantum mechanicsSpectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the Balmer-series x-rays of kaonic 4 He atoms using large-area silicon drift x-ray detectors (SDDs) in order to study the low-energy [Formula: see text]-nucleus strong interaction. The energy of the 3d → 2p transition was determined to be 6467 ± 3( stat ) ± 2( syst ) eV . The resulting strong-interaction energy-level shift is in agreement with theoretical calculations, thus eliminating a long-standing discrepancy between theory and experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Physics Letters ASame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207