MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986223165 · doi:10.1038/nature13182

A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas

2014· article· en· W1986223165 on OpenAlexaff
Bogumił Kaczkowski, Mutsumi Kanamori-Katayama, Charles Plessy, Timo Lassmann, Alessandro Bonetti, Matthias Harbers, Tsugumi Kawashima, Hiroko Ohmiya, Eri Saijyo, Jun Kawai, Harukazu Suzuki, Masayoshi Itoh, Shiro Fukuda, Shigehiro Yoshida, Takehiro Hashimoto, Akiko Saka, Thierry Sengstag, Atsutaka Kubosaki, Carsten O. Daub, A. Maxwell Burroughs, Jordan A. Ramilowski, Hiromi Nishiyori, Noriko Ninomiya, Hisashi Shimoji, Hideya Kawaji, Shohei Noma, Shintaro Katayama, Miki Kojima, Masanori Suzuki, Kenichi Nakazato, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Sayaka Nagao-Sato, Kaoru Kaida, Ai Kaiho, Yuki Hasegawa, Nicolas Bertin, Morana Vitezic, Akira Hasegawa, Alka Saxena, Shoko Watanabe, Michihira Tagami, Alistair R. R. Forrest, Takeya Kasukawa, Matthias Edinger, Michael Rehli, Christian Schmidl, Kim Summers, Anagha Joshi, Lynsey Fairbairn, David Hume, Malcolm E Fisher, Tom C. Freeman, J. Kenneth Baillie, Vanja Haberle, Boris Lenhard, Ivan V. Kulakovskiy, Artem S. Kasianov, Yulia A. Medvedeva, Ilya E. Vorontsov, Yun Chen, Ilka Hoof, Mette Jørgensen, Robin Andersson, Kang Li, Berit Lilje, Xiaobei Zhao, Albin Sandelin, Chris Mungall, Terrence F. Meehan, John A. C. Archer, Boris R. Janković, Mamoon Rashid, Ulf Schaefer, Benoı̂t Marchand, Emmanuel Dimont, Shannan J. Ho Sui, Oliver Hofmann, Łukasz Huminiecki, Sarah Rennie, James Prendergast, Martin S. Taylor, Robert S. Young, Colin A. Semple, Alison Meynert, Patrizia Rizzu, Margherita Francescatto, Peter Heutink, Davide Albanese, Marco Roncador, Marco Chierici, Giuseppe Jurman, Cesare Furlanello, Niklas Mejhert, Peter Arner, Magda Babina, Sven Guhl, Piotr J. Balwierz, Erik van Nimwegen, Anthony G Beckhouse, Ernst J. Wolvetang, James Briggs, Dipti Vijayan, Kelly J Hitchens, Dmitry A. Ovchinnikov, Antje Blumenthal, Swati Pradhan-Bhatt, Judith A. Blake, Tony Kenna, Beatrice Bodega, Valerio Orlando, Suzana Savvi, Reto Guler, Anita Schwegmann, Frank Brombacher, Andrea Califano, Yishai Shimoni, Timothy Ravasi, Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci, Daniel Carbajo, Jessica C. Mar, Emiliano Dalla, Claudio Schneider, Yari Ciani, Silvano Piazza, Roberto Verardo, Hans Clevers, Marc van de Wetering, T Gingeras, Carrie Davis, Michael Detmar, Sarah Krampitz, Alexander D. Diehl, Yuki I. Kawamura, Taeko Dohi, Morten Beck Rye, Finn Drabløs, Judith S. Kempfle, Albert S.B. Edge, Juha Kere, Andreas Lennartsson, Karl Ekwall, Helena Persson, Mariko Okada, Mitsuhiro Endoh, Hiroshi Ohno, Haruhiko Koseki, Hiroshi Kawamoto, Tomokatsu Ikawa

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesRIKENBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNovo Nordisk FondenMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyLundbeckfondenWellcome Trust
KeywordsBiologyPromoterTranscription factorGeneComputational biologyGeneticsHuman genomeGenomeCell typeTranscription (linguistics)Gene expressionGene expression profilingTranscriptomeTranscriptional regulationRegulation of gene expressionCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regulated transcription controls the diversity, developmental pathways and spatial organization of the hundreds of cell types that make up a mammal. Using single-molecule cDNA sequencing, we mapped transcription start sites (TSSs) and their usage in human and mouse primary cells, cell lines and tissues to produce a comprehensive overview of mammalian gene expression across the human body. We find that few genes are truly ‘housekeeping’, whereas many mammalian promoters are composite entities composed of several closely separated TSSs, with independent cell-type-specific expression profiles. TSSs specific to different cell types evolve at different rates, whereas promoters of broadly expressed genes are the most conserved. Promoter-based expression analysis reveals key transcription factors defining cell states and links them to binding-site motifs. The functions of identified novel transcripts can be predicted by coexpression and sample ontology enrichment analyses. The functional annotation of the mammalian genome 5 (FANTOM5) project provides comprehensive expression profiles and functional annotation of mammalian cell-type-specific transcriptomes with wide applications in biomedical research. A study from the FANTOM consortium using single-molecule cDNA sequencing of transcription start sites and their usage in human and mouse primary cells, cell lines and tissues reveals insights into the specificity and diversity of transcription patterns across different mammalian cell types. FANTOM5 (standing for functional annotation of the mammalian genome 5) is the fifth major stage of a major international collaboration that aims to dissect the transcriptional regulatory networks that define every human cell type. Two Articles in this issue of Nature present some of the project's latest results. The first paper uses the FANTOM5 panel of tissue and primary cell samples to define an atlas of active, in vivo bidirectionally transcribed enhancers across the human body. These authors show that bidirectional capped RNAs are a signature feature of active enhancers and identify more than 40,000 enhancer candidates from over 800 human cell and tissue samples. The enhancer atlas is used to compare regulatory programs between different cell types and identify disease-associated regulatory SNPs, and will be a resource for studies on cell-type-specific enhancers. In the second paper, single-molecule sequencing is used to map human and mouse transcription start sites and their usage in a panel of distinct human and mouse primary cells, cell lines and tissues to produce the most comprehensive mammalian gene expression atlas to date. The data provide a plethora of insights into open reading frames and promoters across different cell types in addition to valuable annotation of mammalian cell-type-specific transcriptomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2,175
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsFrench-language works237,207