Dependence of Phospholipase D1 Multi-monoubiquitination on Its Enzymatic Activity and Palmitoylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phospholipase D (PLD) is an important lipase in many cellular processes, including vesicular trafficking, cell survival, and cell migration. In the present study, we show that PLD1, but not PLD2, is posttranslationally modified by multi-monoubiquitination. Intriguingly, suppression of lipase activity either by mutation of the HKD motif (PLD1 H896R, K898R, or D903A) or the phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate binding motif (PLD1 R691G,R695G) or through use of PLD-selective inhibitors impaired the ubiquitination of PLD1, although stimulation of lipase activity by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate did not enhance its ubiquitination. A palmitoylation-deficient mutant PLD1 allele, which exhibits altered patterns of vesicular trafficking, had significantly lower levels of monoubiquitination. In addition, the expression of ubiquitin-fused PLD1 induced aberrantly enlarged vesicles partially co-localized with the Golgi complex but not with early endosomes. The altered localization was reduced by the K898R mutation, suggesting a role of multi-monoubiquitination in PLD1 subcellular localization. Surprisingly, the degradation of PLD1, but not of PLD1 K898R or PLD2, was blocked by inhibitors of proteasomes but not by inhibitors of lysosomes or other proteases, suggesting a role of the ubiquitination in proteasomal degradation of PLD1. In summary, our studies show that PLD1, but not PLD2, is multi-monoubiquitinated. The ubiquitination modification might represent a novel regulatory mechanism in PLD1 functioning, particularly in the context of subcellular trafficking between different membrane compartments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".