Effects of wetting and drying on seed germination and seedling emergence of bull thistle, <i>Cirsium vulgare</i> (Savi) Ten.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seeds of bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten., were exposed to varying numbers of cycles of wetting and drying, in both Petri dishes and pots of soil, to investigate the effects of exposure to such cycles on subsequent germination of the seeds or emergence of the seedlings. Following exposure to the cycles, seeds in Petri dishes were set to germinate in one of four diurnal environments: 20:10°C alternating light and darkness, 20:10°C constant darkness, 30:15°C alternating light and darkness, or 30:15°C constant darkness. Total percent germination was reduced after exposure to eight cycles of wetting and drying, and germination rate was reduced after exposure to two or more cycles. Percent germination was reduced at the higher temperature but light availability had little effect. Reduction in seedling emergence in pots of soil after exposure to an intermediate number of cycles was greater than in Petri dishes but not as great with exposure to eight cycles. Seedling emergence patterns in pots that experienced any wetting-drying treatment were bimodal, with a second pulse of emergence several weeks after the termination of the cycles. This suggests that some seeds were induced into a dormant state through exposure to the cycles of wetting and drying. Such induced dormancy may serve to prevent seed germination in the autumn, promoting an attenuated and intermittent pattern of germination.Key words: Cirsium vulgare, bull thistle, wetting and drying, seed germination, induced dormancy, intermittent germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it