Coping and psychological adjustment in adolescents with vertically acquired HIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children with vertically acquired HIV face the challenges of adolescence in addition to the demands of coping with their illness. The relationship between coping and psychological adjustment has been widely studied in adults and children with chronic diseases but it is poorly understood in adolescents with HIV. This study aimed to identify whether a UK sample of adolescents with vertically acquired HIV had poor psychological adjustment and to clarify the relationship between coping and psychological adjustment in this sample. Thirty adolescents with vertically acquired HIV (aged 11-17) filled in questionnaires of coping and psychological adjustment and a correlational design was used to determine if specific coping styles were related to quality of psychological adjustment. Results showed that younger children had lower levels of psychological adjustment than older adolescents, although as a group the adolescents scored within normal ranges. Psychological adjustment was significantly related to two coping styles, Ventilating feelings and Being humorous. Exploratory analysis examined the extent of HIV disclosure in this sample and the degree of satisfaction felt about the nature of communication about the diagnosis. The results showed that participants had few confidants but were satisfied with the nature of communication about their status. The level of satisfaction was not related to adjustment. On the basis of the results, potential clinical implications for adolescents with vertically acquired HIV who might be struggling not only with the challenging demands of adolescence but also with their illness are discussed. The need to adopt a developmental approach to coping and psychological adjustment is emphasized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".