MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986288923 · doi:10.1139/l03-099

Étude du biais dans le modèle log-linéaire d'estimation régionale

2004· article· en· W1986288923 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Claude Girard, Taha B. M. J. Ouarda, Bernard Bobée

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLogarithmVariable (mathematics)StatisticsVariablesMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Log-linear models are frequently used in hydrology, especially for the regional estimation of flood volumes based on the physiographic data of a set of basins. A log-linear model describes a linear relationship between the log of a dependant variable and independent variables which are functions of parameters, of which the value remains to be determined. It is determined by using a set of basins with known values of dependant and independent variables. The model is then used to obtain a prediction for the dependant variable logarithm of a basin of interest, based on the known values of independent variables in the model. This prediction is unbiased with relation to the log of the target variable. However, the exponential value of this prediction is biased with relation to the target variable. This paper addresses the measures to correct the bias in the prediction, which is introduced by exponentiation; the impacts on the variance of the ensuing predictions is also discussed. Key words: bias, transformation, log-linear model.[Journal translation]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207