MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986319512 · doi:10.1117/12.2023328

LWIR polarization sensing: investigation of liquids and solids with MoDDIFS

2013· article· en· W1986319512 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Fortin, Jean‐Marc Thériault, Paul Lacasse

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadianceHyperspectral imagingOpticsMaterials sciencePolarization (electrochemistry)SpectrometerFourier transform infrared spectroscopyInfraredFourier transformStokes parametersOptoelectronicsRemote sensingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MoDDIFS (Multi-option Differential Detection and Imaging Fourier Spectrometer) is a DRDC Valcartier technology built around a differential Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer optimized for optical subtraction in the long wave infrared (LWIR). MoDDIFS is a dual use hyperspectral prototype offering two fore-optics configurations: "long range", specialized for the detection of small quantities of gaseous substances, and "polarization", built to investigate liquids and powders spills. We report and present a preliminary analysis of a series of measurement tests made with the polarization configuration. The tests were performed under indoor and outdoor environments. Different liquid and solid substances were deposited on different types of surfaces. Many liquid targets and some solid materials produce a noticeable linearly-polarized signal, with a more or less characteristic spectral modulation. For the liquids, the behavior of the observed radiance spectrum seems more predictable when the liquid is thick, or when it is deposited at any thickness on non-absorbing and weakly-reflective substrates. The behavior of the radiance spectrum observed becomes more complex when a thin layer of the liquid is deposited on a smooth and strongly-reflective substrate, or on an absorbing substrate. The parameter chosen to analyze the relative amount of polarization is the degree of linear polarization. When its value is noticeable, the polarized hyperspectral radiance measurements bring additional information on both targets and the backgrounds, as compared to standard unpolarized hyperspectral measurements. The tests performed can then help assess the materials for which the detection and the identification will be improved with polarized measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicGas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsFrench-language works237,207