MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986327893 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016396108

Tubulin acetyltransferase discovered: Ciliary role in the ancestral eukaryote expanded to neurons in metazoans

2010· letter· en· W1986327893 on OpenAlexafffund
Michel R. Leroux

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsEukaryoteBiologyCell biologyTubulinCiliumAscomycotaAcetyltransferaseEvolutionary biologyGeneticsMicrotubuleGenomeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of α- and β-tubulins from an FtsZ-like prokaryotic homolog represented a defining event in eukaryogenesis. It permitted, together with actin and molecular motors, the establishment of a cytoskeleton able to support dynamic events such as cell division and trafficking of vesicles and proteins. It also served as the foundation for the microtubule-based cilium, an organelle with motility and sensory functions that replaced the less versatile prokaryotic flagellum (1). As it turns out, a mechanism to stabilize the ciliary axoneme, involving acetylation of α-tubulin, evolved in the ancestral eukaryote (2–4). This reversible modification situated inside the microtubule lumen still operates in extant ciliated protists and is exploited by metazoans to support ancillary microtubule functions, particularly in neurons (5). The concurrent discovery of an α-tubulin acetyltransferase by two separate groups, published in PNAS (3) and in Nature (4), now paves the way for a detailed understanding of the cellular and physiological roles conferred by tubulin acetylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207