Chromosomal assignment of amplified genes in hydroxyurea-resistant hamster cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have shown previously that cDNAs for the M1 and M2 subunits of ribonucleotide reductase, ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), and p5-8, a 55,000-Dalton protein, hybridize to amplified genomic sequences in a highly hydroxyurea-resistant hamster cell line. We have extended these observations to include two additional, independently isolated, hydroxyurea-resistant cell lines: SC8, a single-step hamster ovary cell line, and KH450, a multistep human myeloid leukemic cell line, have also undergone genomic amplification for sequences homologous to ODC and p5-8 cDNAs. However, neither SC8 nor KH450 contains amplified genomic sequences homologous to an M1 cDNA probe. A panel of mouse-hamster somatic cell hybrids was used to map sequences homologous to M1, M2, ODC, and 5-8 cDNAs in the hamster genome. The M2, ODC, and p5-8 cDNAs hybridized to DNA fragments that segregated with hamster chromosome 7. In contrast, M1 cDNA hybridized to DNA fragments that segregated with hamster chromosome 3. These data suggest that the genes RRM2, (M2), ODC, and p5-8, but not RRMI (M1), are linked and may have been co-amplified in the selection of the hydroxyurea-resistant hamster and human cell lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it