MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Macroeconomic Impact of Establishing a Large‐scale Fuel Ethanol Plant on the Canadian Economy

2000· article· fr· W1986346829 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul J. Thomassin, Laurie Baker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomyEconomicsHumanitiesForestryMacroEconometric analysisWelfare economicsGeographyEconometricsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes the macroeconomic impact of establishing a large‐scale fuel ethanol plant that uses com as its feedstock. An input‐output model of the Canadian economy is used to estimate the macroeconomic impact. The agricultural output data required for the input‐output analysis are generated using an econometric model. The macroeconomic impact of operating this plant is increases in industrial output of $328.6 million, in GDP at factor cost of $84.2 million and in employment of 1,390 jobs. Ce document a pour but d'analyser l'impact macro‐économique de l'installation d'une grande usine productrice d'éthanol, utilisant le maï's comme matière première. Un modèle entrées‐sorties de l'économie canadienne est employé afin d'estimer l'impact macro‐économique. Les données de rendements agricole requises pour cette analyse sont générées à l'aide d'un modèle économétrique. Les impacts macro‐économique qui résultèrent suite à l'opération de cette usine sont: un augmentation de $328.6 millions du rendement industriel, une augmentation de $84.2 millions du PIB au coût des facteurs, ainsi qu'un gain de 1,390 emplois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomieSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207