MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986399345 · doi:10.1109/ipec.2010.5543143

A segmented gate driver with adjustable driving capability for efficiency optimization

2010· article· en· W1986399345 on OpenAlexaff
Armin A. Fomani, Wai Tung Ng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGate driverGate equivalentRingingConvertersPower (physics)Logic gateTransistorNode (physics)Overshoot (microwave communication)NAND gatePower semiconductor deviceElectronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringGate oxideVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the effect of the gate driving capability on the efficiency of synchronous buck converters. To reduce the switching loss in DC-DC converters, the gate drivers are often designed to turn the power MOSFETs on/off as quickly as possible. However, for fast turn on/off, gate drivers with high driving capability and consequently high power consumption are required. Since the gate driver power consumption is independent of the load, the gate driver power consumption at light load could become a large portion of the total power loss. In this paper, a segmented gate driver with adjustable driving capability is proposed. This allows the optimization of the power conversion efficiency as a function of the loading condition. The results of this work shows an improvement in efficiency of up to 7% under light load condition with a significant reduction in ringing and overshoot at the switching node and at the gate terminals of output stage transistors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207