Crystallization of Ultrathin Films of Polylactides: From Chain Chirality to Lamella Curvature and Twisting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystallization of poly( d -lactide) (PDLA) and poly( l -lactide) (PLLA) in ultrathin films (15 nm) has been followed between 125 and 160 °C using in situ atomic force microscopy. Using a forced nucleation technique, edge-on lamellae were observed, showing a curvature which is related to the polymer chirality. In the case of PLLA, the lamellae are S-shaped, contrary to the PDLA lamellae which are Z-shaped. This behavior was also observed on TEM pictures of PLLA and PDLA films crystallized in the same conditions, without any external nucleation. As shown by electron diffraction patterns, the crystalline unit cells of the two enantiomers are identical. For the first time, a relationship has been established between the molecular chirality of poly(lactide)s and their macroscopic behavior. Moreover, the direction of curvature of the lamellae can be linked with the sense of twisting of the poly(lactide) lamellae in banded spherulites, and the temperature dependence of the radius of curvature can be correlated with the distance between the extinction rings. Those observations are consistent with Keith and Padden's model since the curved crystals in ultrathin films can be considered as “half-lamellae”, which give, when associated together, twisted complete lamellae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".