Probing spin states of coupled quantum dots by a dc Josephson current
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate the idea for probing spin states of two coupled quantum dots (CQDs) by the dc Josephson current flowing through them. This theory requires weak coupling between CQDs and electrodes, but allows arbitrary interdot tunnel coupling, intradot and interdot Coulomb interactions. We find that the Coulomb blockade peaks exhibit a nonmonotonous dependence on the Zeeman splitting of CQDs, which can be understood in terms of Andreev bound states. More importantly, the supercurrent in the Coulomb blockade valleys may provide information on the spin states of CQDs: for CQDs with total electron number $N=1,3$ (odd), the supercurrent will reverse its sign if the CQD becomes a magnetic molecule; for a CQD with $N=2$ (even), the supercurrent will decrease sharply around the transition between the spin singlet and triplet ground states of the CQD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".