Welcome to the 19th International Congress of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On behalf of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I bid all participants a warm welcome to the 19th International Congress of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.It will be the second Congress of the new Millennium and the second Congress carried out in cooperation with an Associated Regional Organization, this time with the Pan American Association for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (PABMB).Although it is the third time for the holding of a second Congress in a particular host country, we congratulate Toronto and the local society hosts, the Canadian Society of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology for this being the first occasion that the IUBMB has arranged a second Congress in the same city.We are happy to recognise the cosponsorship of the Congress by PABMB, CSBMB and the National Research Council of Canada.The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology can be considered as a consortium that is devoted to the advancement of these two scientific disciplines, with especial emphasis on international collaboration.The International Union of Biochemistry (IUB; which became the IUBMB in 1991) was established in 1955.Its mission is simple but broad, namely to foster and support the growth and advancement of biochemistry and molecular biology.The IUBMB strives to achieve these aims (particularly in geographical areas where biochemistry is less well developed) by promoting international cooperation and high standards in research, discussion, application and publication, and through the international standardization of methods, nomenclature and symbols.The IUBMB promotes the norms, values, standards and ethics of science, and the free unrestricted movement of all scientists interested in biochemistry and molecular biology.The IUBMB unites most of the world's biochemists and molecular biologists through their academies of science,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.156 | 0.099 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".