MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986437615 · doi:10.1159/000299117

The Fate of Trophoblast Retained within the Oviduct in the Mouse

2010· article· en· W1986437615 on OpenAlex
D.A. Tutton, D. H. Carr

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrophoblastOviductLumen (anatomy)BiologyEpitheliumBlastocystAndrologyPlacentaAnatomyPregnancyCell biologyEmbryoEndocrinologyFetusMedicineEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-implantation blastocysts or trophoblast, obtained from ectoplacental cones, were transferred to the right oviducts of both pregnant and nonpregnant mice. Blastocysts which remained within the oviductal lumen did not show evidence of further differentiation into trophoblast although they readily implanted on various extratubal sites. Similarly, trophoblast from ectoplacental cones failed to show invasive properties when restricted to the lumen. In 3 cases where trophoblast giant cells were found within the tubal lumen, entry appeared to have been contingent on an existing breach in the epithelium. Invasive action on tubal epithelium by trophoblast was not seen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it