Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le cinéma québécois n'est pas une industrie autonome. Le cinéma québécois dépend d'exploitants et de distributeurs qui ne sont pas québécois. Le cinéma québécois dépend pour sa production de capitaux qui viennent de l'extérieur du Québec et ce " non-Québécois " qui conditionne notre cinéma à ces trois niveaux est majoritairement américain. Ceci dit l'auteur essaie d'analyser l'impact qualitatif que le cinéma américain produit sur la société québécoise et sur l'industrie du cinéma au Québec. Ce problème cependant n'est pas particulier au Québec. " C'est à l'échelle internationale, y compris les pays de l'Est, que se pose le problème de l'impact du cinéma américain. Le cinéma, comme médium, est devenu américain ". Pourtant, et malgré tout, il y a dans le cinéma québécois des signes évidents d'une certaine volonté de garder ses distances vis-à-vis la production de type américain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".