MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986462943 · doi:10.1117/12.525512

Modeling the laser-induced diffusible resistance process

2004· article· en· W1986462943 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Meunier, Jean-Yves Degorce, Jean-Numa Gillet, François Magny

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDiffusionDopantDiodeDiffusion equationSpreading resistance profilingDiffusion processLaserHeat equationOptoelectronicsSemiconductor laser theoryTransistorProcess (computing)MechanicsComputer scienceDopingVoltageOpticsThermodynamicsElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly accurate resistances can be made by iterative laser-induced local diffusion of dopants from the drain and source of a gateless field effect transistor into its channel, thereby forming an electrical link between two adjacent p-n junction diodes. In this paper we present a complete modeling, which permits to obtain the device characteristics from process parameters. Three-dimensional (3D) temperature calculations are performed from heat diffusion equation using an apparent heat capacity formulation. Melted region determinations are satisfactory compared with in-situ real-time optical measurements of the melted region behavior. Then 3D dopant diffusion profiles are calculated using Fick’s diffusion equation. Finally electronic characteristics are obtained from the new tube multiplexing algorithm for computing the I-V characteristic and the device differential resistance. Numerical simulations using our software are satisfactory compared with experimental I-V measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207