MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986475954 · doi:10.1143/jjap.42.4576

Simulation Study on the Measurements of Diffusion Coefficients in Solid Materials by Short-lived Radiotracer Beams

2003· article· en· W1986475954 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sun-Chan Jeong, Ichiro Katayama, H. Kawakami, H. Ishiyama, H. Miyatake, M. Sataka, A. Iwase, S. Okayasu, Hiroyuki Sugai, Shinichi Ichikawa, Katsuhisa Nishio, Y. Sugiyama, M. Yahagi, Kazunori Takada, Mamoru Watanabe

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsDiffusionSpectral lineMeasure (data warehouse)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Particle (ecology)Materials scienceSample (material)Atomic physicsChemistryThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have examined, by a computer simulation, an on-line measurement of diffusion coefficients by using a short-lived alpha particle emitter, 8 Li (half life of 0.84 s), as a radiotracer. The energy spectra of alpha particles emitted from diffusing 8 Li primarily implanted in the sample of LiAl are simulated as a measure of the diffusion of 8 Li in the sample. As a possible time sequence for the measurement, a time cycle of 6 s, i.e. the implantation of 8 Li for 1.5 s and subsequent diffusion for 4.5 s, is supposed. The sample is primarily set on a given temperature for the measurement. The time-dependent yields of alpha particles during the time cycle reveal the possibility to measure the diffusion coefficient with an accuracy of 10% if larger than 1 × 10 -9 cm 2 /s, by the comparison with the experimental spectra measured at the temperature, i.e. at a certain diffusion coefficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207