MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986511297 · doi:10.1144/0016-764904-104

Constraints on the thermal energy released from the Chicxulub impactor: new evidence from multi-method charcoal analysis

2005· article· en· W1986511297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire M. Belcher, Margaret E. Collinson, Andrew C. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Geological Society · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharcoalGeologyMineralogyEarth scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been suggested by various workers that an extraterrestrial impact at the K–T boundary delivered sufficient thermal power to ignite globally extensive wildfires. Numerous models have sought to predict the amount of thermal power released by the impact, but none have considered the distribution of wildfire indicators in K–T rocks. Probably the most distinctive product from combustion of biomass is charcoal. The abundance of charcoal across the K–T boundary at eight non-marine sites in North America, stretching from Colorado in the south to Saskatchewan in the north, is recorded using three separate methods that allow quantitative analyses of microscopic to macroscopic charcoal particles. This study not only provides the first extensive study of charcoals across the K–T boundary but also uses the presence or absence of charred material to predict the extent and severity of the thermal pulse released by the K–T impact across the area predicted to have suffered the most extreme environmental effects. The K–T rocks contain on average between four and eight times (according to the method used) less charcoal than the Cretaceous rock record and non-charred plant remains are abundant in the K–T rocks. The below-background charcoal abundance and the high proportion of noncharred material in the K–T and lowermost Tertiary rocks across the Western Interior of North America suggest that there were no significant wildfires in this area associated with the K–T event. Although soot and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been reported in the K–T rocks we suggest that the soot morphology and PAH types are more consistent with a source from the vaporization of hydrocarbons rather than biomass. For spontaneous ignition of vegetation temperatures >545 °C are necessary, whereas smouldering will begin at 325 °C. The below-background levels of charcoal in the K–T rocks allow the ground temperatures following the K–T impact to be constrained to between no more than 545 °C at any point and not above 325 °C for any significant period. This implies a maximum irradiance of <19 kW m −2 at the ground surface and that no more than 6 kW m −2 of thermal power was delivered to the ground for more than a few hours. Therefore our results show that the fossil record indicates that the impact at Chixculub did not generate sufficient thermal power to ignite extensive wildfires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Geological SocietySame topicBuilding materials and conservationFrench-language works237,207