MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986512145 · doi:10.1093/fs/knm138

Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in Eighteenth-Century French Texts Narrative Interludes: Musical Tableaux in Eighteenth-Century French Texts. By T <scp>ili</scp> B <scp>oon</scp> C <scp>uillÉ</scp> . University of Toronto Press, 2006. xxiv + 284 pp. Hb £48.00; $75.00.

2007· article· en· W1986512145 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amy Wygant

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeMusicalLiteratureArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anyone who followed the polemics surrounding the building and inauguration of the Opéra Bastille and its bicentenary musical programme will not be surprised to learn that the French had repeatedly gone to war over music in the past. The argument of this book situates itself in the eighteenth-century debates over the suitability of the French language for musical expression, and the moral implications of music for women. Is French opera, and therefore the French language, and therefore the French nation, going to be forever incapable of surpassing the Italians? Is a woman playing or listening to music automatically apt to be seductive or seduced? Rousseau, it will be seen, is dead centre in both of these problematics, and the responses to his claims about music and language in the Lettre sur la musique française and about the education of Sophie in the Émile, structure the book's six chapters. It will not be news to scholars that those authors taken up in the book's first half, Diderot, Beaumarchais and Cazotte, produced pointed observations on Rousseau's ideas about music and the nation. Nor is it a new thought that those read in the second half, Charrière, Cottin, Krüdener and Staël, wrote about the cultural association of women, music and immorality. This book, however, settles on a particular textual device, the musical tableau, as a tell-tale moment in all of the texts under consideration, and neatly shows how it overpowers or undermines surface meaning. The musical tableau is a musical performance staged for a beholder inscribed within the text. Theoretically, it operates in the vicinity of Michael Fried's Absorption and Theatricality, that is, of the double absorption of the actor, be s/he playing a game of knucklebones or playing a harpsichord, and the absorption of the spectator in the actor's absorption. However, the almost complete ahistoricity of Fried's path-breaking identification of this structure created an opportunity to test its connections, whether to the rhetoric of the hypotyposis, or to the history of the play-within-a-play. The finesse of the present study lies in its mobilization of this opportunity. Through an impressive series of close readings of such scenes, for example the harpsichord recital in Cazotte's Le Diable amoureux during which Alvare peeps through a keyhole to watch and listen to Biondetta playing purportedly Italian music, and which is beautifully reproduced on the dust jacket for the Peeping Tom reader, Boon Cuillé shows that music's indeterminacy troubles any easy reading of these texts. Missing here is any real reflection on what it means to write an account such as this. There may be too many things that lead on ‘inexorably’ to the next, a few too many movements ‘feeding into’ later ones, and too many forerunners and things on the verge of this or that. However, the energy saved by not interrogating its own writing of history is profitably expended on opening up a whole world of the troubled reception of Rousseau's musical aesthetics, and on an indefatigable practice of close reading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207