MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986534746 · doi:10.1081/drt-120015417

DRYING OF LATEX FILMS OF POLY(VINYL ACETATE)

2002· article· en· W1986534746 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAerogels and thermal insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVinyl acetateMaterials scienceComposite materialPolymerEvaporationAir velocityAdhesivePolymer chemistryCopolymerMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Drying of Poly(vinyl acetate) latex films has wide application in the industries of synthetic fibers, adhesives, coatings, paints, etc. In this investigation, drying of Poly(vinyl acetate) latex film was studied experimentally in a drying tunnel where the air velocity and temperature were controlled. The water evaporation rate was obtained by weighing the latex film during the drying process. The weight loss of latex was measured for different polymer concentrations, film thicknesses, drying areas, temperatures, and air velocities. Results emphasize the important role of these parameters on the relative water transport from the latex film. Increasing air velocity and temperature leads to a significant increase of the weight loss of latex and drying rate. Changing other parameters affects only the rate of weight loss but not the constant drying rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it