Photo aldol reactions with 5-methoxyoxazoles: Highly regio- and diastereoselective synthesis of α-amino β-hydroxy carboxylic acid derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A versatile route to derivatives of α-amino β-hydroxy carboxylic acids, either with tertiary (from a corresponding glycine equivalent) or a quaternary α-carbon center is described. The key reaction is the cycloaddition of electronically excited carbonyl compounds (aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, respectively) to oxazoles. To make the products hydrolytically more labile, a methoxy substituent at position C-5 was introduced leading to the formation of cycloadducts with an orthoester substructure. The photocycloaddition, either with triplet excited (aromatic) carbonyls or with singlet excited (aliphatic) carbonyls, led to the formation of mixtures of endo- and exo-diastereoisomers with moderate to very high exo-selectivities. The 4-unsubstituted 5-methoxyoxazole 1 (glycine equivalent) gave the [2 + 2]-adducts 3a3f with aldehydes 2a2f in high yields and excellent diastereoselectivities. Hydrolysis of these compounds resulted in the α-amino β-hydroxy esters 4a4f with preferred erythro (S*,S*) configuration. As an extension of this process, 4-alkylated 5-methoxyoxazoles 5a5f were applied as alkene components and the corresponding cycloadducts with benzaldehyde 6a6f were obtained. Again, the exo-diastereoisomers were formed as the major products in diastereoselectivities from 73:27 (exo:endo) up to >95:5. Hydrolysis of these adducts resulted in the formation of α-amino β-hydroxy esters 7a7f with like (S*,S*) configuration of the major diastereoisomers.Key words: photo aldol reaction, oxazoles, oxetanes, photocycloaddition, amino acids, hydroxy acids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".