MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1986552766 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0125

Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World’s Longest Undefended Border across the Western Plains (review)

2008· article· en· W1986552766 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sheila McManus

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGeographyNarrativeNinthArchaeologyAncient historyArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World’s Longest Undefended Border across the Western Plains Sheila McManus Arc of the Medicine Line: Mapping the World’s Longest Undefended Border across the Western Plains. Tony Rees. Toronto: Douglas & Mcintyre, 2007. Pp. 384, $36.95 Tony Rees is an excellent storyteller and this story is worth telling. Arc of the Medicine Line is the first detailed narrative of the 1872–4 survey of the Canada-U.S. border between the Lake of the Woods and the Rocky Mountains. In less than three years the British and American survey teams mapped and marked more than eight hundred miles of the forty-ninth parallel from the Lake of the Woods to the Continental Divide, produced detailed topographical maps of about nine thousand square miles, and placed 388 boundary markers including iron pillars, stone cairns, and earth mounds (344). The book provides enough technical information for a lay reader to understand and appreciate the full range of scientific work the teams conducted, which went far beyond the survey itself to include the flora and fauna. But the real focus is on the British, Canadian, and American men who made up the two commissions. The story is grounded in extensive primary research – the reports, journal, diaries, and letters written by men from both teams. The highlight is certainly the personal correspondence, where the men told their wives and family members exactly what they thought of each other, their jobs, the food, the weather, the land they were passing through, and the Native peoples they met along the way. The book is organized chronologically so that a reader can follow each step of the journey. The map at the front of the book is excellent, and the photos are familiar but reproduced to a very high standard. Scholarly readers will have two concerns with the book. The first is that there is very little secondary research in the book, and what is there is a bit dated. There is no mention of recent scholarship about the Canada-U.S. border or the outstanding recent scholarship about the Native peoples of the borderlands like the Cree, Sioux, Metis, and Blackfoot. There is little historiographical context for the narrative, and perhaps this was Rees’s goal, because context has a way of bogging down a good story. The lack of historical context will be the other concern many readers will have, and this is particularly problematic in Rees’s treatment of First Nations peoples. By emphasizing the ‘moment’ the survey started and framing it with Aboriginal deaths, Rees leaves one with the impression that this survey marked the end of the Aboriginal chapter [End Page 585] of the history of the West and the start of the chapter about heroic white men conquering the land. The introduction and the final chapter hinge upon the Cypress Hills Massacre of 1873, the flight of the Sioux northward after Little Bighorn in 1876, and the flight of the Nez Perce in 1877; the final chapter also throws in the 1885 Northwest Rebellion to explain where the Metis went. This gives the unfortunate impression that the book is sounding the death knell for groups who are still alive and well today, because that makes a more dramatic backdrop for the central cast of white characters. Native peoples do appear throughout the book, but as backdrop – convenient but lazy workers, or necessary but inscrutable informants, or invisible moccasin-providers, or threatening opponents. This problem is perhaps unavoidable, given the emphasis on primary sources written exclusively by white men, and the lack of secondary sources that could have given other perspectives. The story of the 1872–4 boundary survey, the men involved, and the staggering amount of work they completed has been waiting a long time for its own full treatment. This book is invaluable for any of us who work on the history of the Canada-U.S border across the West, and will be appreciated by anyone eager to know more about the border itself. Sheila McManus University of Lethbridge Copyright © 2008 University of Toronto Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→