Atrial fibrillation-associated minK38G/S polymorphism modulates delayed rectifier current and membrane localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common acquired arrhythmia with multi-factorial pathogenesis. Recently, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP, A/G) at position 112 in the KCNE1 gene, resulting in a glycine/serine amino acid substitution at position 38 of the minK peptide, was associated with AF occurrence (AF more frequent with minK38G); however, the functional effect of this SNP is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used patch clamp recording, confocal microscopy and protein biochemistry to study the effect of this SNP on delayed-rectifier current expression and mathematical simulation to identify potential functional consequences. The density of slow delayed rectifier current (I(Ks)) resulting from co-expression with KvLQT1 was smaller with minK38G (e.g. at +10 mV: 50+/-7 pA/pF in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, 45+/-14 pA/pF for COS-7 cells) compared to minK38S (93+/-17 pA/pF, 104+/-23 pA/pF, respectively, P<0.05 for each). I(Ks) kinetics and voltage-dependence were unaffected. Currents resulting from co-expression of human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) were similar for minK38G and minK38S, e.g. upon repolarization from +10 to -50 mV: tail currents 23+/-4 pA/pF versus 22+/-5 pA/pF (P=ns). KvLQT1 membrane immunofluorescence was less in CHO cells co-expressing minK38G versus minK38S, and surface expression of KvLQT1, as determined by labelling with streptavidin/biotin, was increased with minK38S co-expression. Computer simulations with a human atrial action potential model predicted that the minK38G SNP would slightly prolong the atrial action potential and reduce the frequency for alternans behaviour. In the presence of reduced repolarization reserve, these effects were enhanced and under specific conditions early afterdepolarizations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The minK38G isoform is associated with reduced I(Ks), likely due to decreased KvLQT1 membrane expression. This study reveals a novel amino acid determinant of the minK-KvLQT1 interaction, and if the role of minK38G in AF is confirmed, would suggest mechanistic heterogeneity in genetic determinants of AF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".