MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986567917 · doi:10.1080/0305215x.2010.548865

Multiple yard cranes scheduling for loading operations in a container terminal

2011· article· en· W1986567917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Optimization · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYardTabu searchScheduling (production processes)Terminal (telecommunication)Container (type theory)Job shop schedulingInteger programmingEngineeringMathematical optimizationComputer scienceGenetic algorithmOperations researchComputer networkAlgorithmMathematicsOperations managementRouting (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of yard crane scheduling is critical in increasing the throughput of a maritime terminal. This article studies the problem of scheduling multiple yard cranes in loading operations. The movements of yard cranes among container blocks and the sequencing of yard cranes within each block are studied at the same time. Potential interferences between yard cranes are considered. A mixed integer programming model is developed to formulate the problem. A genetic algorithm and a tabu search algorithm are proposed to obtain near-optimal solutions. Experimental tests are conducted to evaluate the performance of the two algorithms based on various data settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it