MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986575524 · doi:10.1021/cm0704332

CdSe/ZnS QDs Embedded in Cellulose Triacetate Films with Hydrophilic Surfaces

2007· article· en· W1986575524 on OpenAlexafffund
Tíffany Abitbol, Derek G. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresMcGill University
KeywordsCellulose triacetateX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyMaterials scienceQuantum dotCelluloseTransmission electron microscopySpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PolymerChemical engineeringChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum dot (QD)/polymer composite films were prepared by solvent casting suspensions of CdSe/ZnS semiconductor nanoparticles in cellulose triacetate (CTA) solution. The common solubilities of the organic ligands capping the QDs and of the polymer permitted the direct addition of QDs into the CTA casting solution. The films were robust, with typical thicknesses of 0.05 mm, and possessed the optical properties characteristic of QDs. The emission wavelength of the QD/CTA films shifted with time but eventually reverted toward its original value. This effect was attributed to changes in humidity and solvent content of the films. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of QD/CTA films revealed that the QDs were well-dispersed within the CTA film matrix. The selective alkaline hydrolysis of QD/CTA films in 0.1 M NaOH over 24 h resulted in the surface conversion of CTA to regenerated cellulose. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) were employed to study the surface composition of the films and transmission mode Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to study the bulk composition. Optical properties of the films were probed both before and after the hydrolysis reaction using fluorescence spectroscopy and were found generally unaltered. The cellulose surfaces of the alkaline-treated films should allow facile incorporation into paper sheets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207