MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1986575997 · doi:10.4271/2012-01-0954

The Electric Fan as a Cooling Package Air Flow Meter

2012· article· en· W1986575997 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International journal of passenger cars. Electronic and electrical systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsChrysler (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetreThermal mass flow meterFan coil unitElectricity meterEnvironmental scienceFlow measurementAirflowElectrical engineeringMass flow meterAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringAir conditioningMechanicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">A D.C. permanent magnet motor powered fan can serve as a cooling package air flow meter. This allows for continuous air flow monitoring during vehicle operation with applications to more precise air flow control schemes. In the freewheel mode, the air flow is a linear function of the open circuit voltage of the motor. In the powered mode, the motor voltage and current can be used with a motor and fan model to predict fan air flow. The model is explained and verifying test results are presented. Comparison of the accuracy and complexity vs. that of arrays of precision anemometers is provided.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it